Detailed information for reference 27268

 De Grave, S. (2003) Historical patterns in the description of North East Atlantic Decapoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology 23(3): 669–677. PDF is 283kB

 

Comment or Correction

Report a problem or comment on this reference.

Thank you!

PDF quality information

PDF quality
Text completeness:3/3 Text is complete
Plate completeness:3/3 Plates are complete (or original has no plates)
Text scan quality:5/5 “Native” PDF, not a scan, so perfectly clear
Plate/figure quality:5/5 “Native” PDF, not a scan, so figures are completely original quality (or there are no figures/plates in the original document, so they are perfect by definition!)
(Completeness refers to presence of entire pages in the document, not whether some pages are partially visible.)
PDF contributorNeil Cumberlidge
PDF comments

Certification information

2010-01-03 N. Dean Pentcheff Viewed paper/PDF original
2007-11-15 N. Dean Pentcheff Viewed paper/PDF original

Reference change log

No changes logged

Reference record internal details

Reference ID 27268
Reference type journalarticle
Authors De Grave, S.
Publication Year (for display) 2003
Publication Year (for sorting) 2003
Title Historical patterns in the description of North East Atlantic Decapoda
Secondary Title Journal of Crustacean Biology
Secondary Authors  
Tertiary Title  
Tertiary Authors  
Volume 23
Issue 3
Pages 669–677
Place published  
Published  
Date  
URL
Abstract
An analysis of historical patterns in the description of North East Atlantic Decapoda is presented. The discovery curve of decapods as a whole indicates that the decapod fauna of the NE Atlantic is well known, with two major peaks in species description rates being identifiable: 1808-1830 and 1855-1890, the latter corresponding to the era of the major oceanographic expeditions. On a sub- to infraordinal level, three major periods can be discerned. An early period (1758 - mid 1880s) during which proportionally more Brachyura were described, followed by a shorter period (mid 1880s - 1920 during which more attention was devoted to Anomura and less speciose taxa (mainly deep water). From the 1920s onwards, species descriptions of Caridea have achieved prominence. Size, ecological traits, extent of occurrence, and taxonomic fashion are thought to be responsible for the early bias towards Brachyura, whilst the anormuran and caridean phrase are more related to field work techniques (deep water dredging in the former) and improved observational techniques.
Keywords SP-NOV PROBABILITY CARIDEA
Remarks  
Reference Contributor Tag atolla
Last Changed Wed Dec 5 10:57:53 2012