| Abstract |
1U.S. Geological Survey, Florida Integrated Science Center, Department of Statistics, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110339,
Gainesville, Florida 32611-0339 USA
2U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, Maryland 20708 USA
3Department of Conservation Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7002, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract. A statistical model is developed for estimating species richness and accumulation
by formulating these community-level attributes as functions of model-based estimators
of species occurrence while accounting for imperfect detection of individual species. The model
requires a sampling protocol wherein repeated observations are made at a collection of sample
locations selected to be representative of the community. This temporal replication provides
the data needed to resolve the ambiguity between species absence and nondetection when
species are unobserved at sample locations. Estimates of species richness and accumulation are
computed for two communities, an avian community and a butterfly community. Our modelbased
estimates suggest that detection failures in many bird species were attributed to low
rates of occurrence, as opposed to simply low rates of detection. We estimate that the avian
community contains a substantial number of uncommon species and that species richness
greatly exceeds the number of species actually observed in the sample. In fact, predictions of
species accumulation suggest that even doubling the number of sample locations would not
have revealed all of the species in the community. In contrast, our analysis of the butterfly
community suggests that many species are relatively common and that the estimated richness
of species in the community is nearly equal to the number of species actually detected in the
sample. Our predictions of species accumulation suggest that the number of sample locations
actually used in the butterfly survey could have been cut in half and the asymptotic richness of
species still would have been attained. Our approach of developing occurrence-based
summaries of communities while allowing for imperfect detection of species is broadly
applicable and should prove useful in the design and analysis of surveys of biodiversity.
Key words: biodiversity; conservation; detection heterogeneity; occurrence heterogeneity; siteoccupancy
models. |